A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.

Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Note: Please fill any area and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave industry blank.

extensive period petitioner wasn't viewed as for promotion, meeting on the departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)

Reasonable grounds can be found to the record to attach the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. However punishment from the alleged offence does not slide during the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit of the petitioner as accused, therefore, case from the petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, advice continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion from the same is hereby reproduced:

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be viewed as, however, we're crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy subject matter towards the approval on the competent authority. Read more

The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel with the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to your death penalty or life imprisonment, along with read more a potential fine.

Using keywords effectively can also be very important. Look at using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by accomplishing an act which in the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death on the this kind of person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

                                                        

Pakistan’s legal system is just not without flaws: overhauling is overdue along with the legislation regarding murder involves major reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the minimum that can be carried out is to make certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.